What problem does it solve? Making non-trivial design decisions alone risks blind spots, and asking the user every design question defeats the purpose of delegating. This Skill runs a hands-off deliberation where three lens agents (Pragmatist, Architect, Advocate) independently position, cross-examine each other, and a synthesiser resolves each decision on cited evidence, returning an approved design without user involvement until the end. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-lens deliberation: Three agents with distinct failure-mode briefs state independent positions concurrently, then cross-examine each other, with vote counting explicitly forbidden in synthesis. - Structured resolution pipeline: A workflow script runs decision groups sequentially, carries consensus forward, applies one tiebreak per split decision, and returns genuinely unresolved decisions to the user. - Review and approval gate: The consolidated design summary goes through a design review, targeted re-deliberation rounds for contested changes, and explicit user approval before implementation. - Use Case: A user says "Add webhook delivery for order events, come back when you have a design." The Skill confirms the brief, explores the codebase, deliberates delivery mechanism and retry semantics across the lenses, resolves the decisions, and presents a reviewed design for approval. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to design a feature hands-off using the design committee, for example: "Design the webhook delivery system for order events, don't ask me design questions, come back when it's done."
