Orchestrates structured design debates among agents to surface trade-offs.
npx skills add https://github.com/Owl-Listener/designpowers --skill design-debate
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: design-debate Source: https://github.com/Owl-Listener/designpowers/tree/main/skills/design-debate Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Owl-Listener/designpowers --skill design-debate
When teams converge on a single direction too quickly, critical trade-offs can be overlooked. This skill orchestrates structured debates between agents to surface competing viewpoints, ensuring the user can make an informed decision.
Initiate a design debate by selecting 2–3 Advocates and presenting a clear design question for evaluation.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To surface design trade-offs, assign 2–3 specialized advocates to present opposing design directions. Include cross-examination and accessibility reviews to challenge assumptions before logging decisions, ensuring divergent reasoning prevents premature consensus.
Orchestrate a formal design debate where advocates challenge assumptions and cross-examine multiple viable directions. Adding an accessibility check ensures robust outcomes, while logging the reasoning creates an auditable record for future reference.
You need to formalize the design process when a strategist identifies multiple viable directions or the user requests options. It defines a step-by-step process with advocates, cross-examination, and accessibility review to surface trade-offs before converging.
Yes, the design debate process integrates accessibility checks alongside advocate cross-examination to surface weaknesses in proposed directions, ensuring the final decision supports inclusive and robust outcomes.
Cross-examination works by having assigned advocates challenge each other's assumptions and present the strongest cases for competing design directions, surfacing hidden weaknesses and trade-offs before a decision is recorded.
A limitation is that using advocates requires selecting 2–3 specialized agents and a clearly framed design question. Without clear objectives or multiple viable directions, the debate process may add unnecessary overhead to the design workflow.
yeeder0520Identify user intent and constraints through one-question-at-a-time prompts.
hulusi-tuncDocument feature accessibility decisions, tradeoffs, and WCAG compliance mappings.
LLM-Dev-OpsAutomate GitHub pull request reviews with multi-agent swarm analysis.
miles990Clarify user intent and convert ideas into structured design plans.
