design-deep-analysis

You can generate code-ready UI refactor recommendations by analyzing an Inertia tsx screen through a specific persona lens. The process scores 15 design dimensions with persona weights and outputs three alternative implementation paths with prepared diffs and smoke-prod measurement guidance.

A multi-angle UX copy and accessibility review runs design critique, design system, and accessibility analyses in parallel on a specific frontend screen. This consolidated approach synthesizes multiple specialized design reviews into a single, cohesive friction diagnosis.

Yes, this analysis specifically targets Inertia tsx screens and requires loading existing persona and customer profile discovery context from memory. It fits workflows needing to investigate reported customer-paid friction or competitive gaps using established profile data.

Actionable A/B/C refactor plans provide three distinct implementation paths—minimum, medium, or architectural rethink—each accompanied by prepared code diffs. These alternatives allow you to directly apply changes and validate improvements using provided smoke-prod metrics.

You should avoid persona-weighted UI analysis when you lack established persona profiles or customer discovery context in memory, as the 15-dimension scoring mechanism fundamentally depends on this data to calculate weighted friction and produce valid refactor recommendations.