design

A structured architectural design workflow guides you through researching, proposing, reviewing, and iterating on technical designs. It ensures all potential issues and alternative approaches are systematically considered before implementation begins.

Adversarial design review is a structured critique loop involving a researcher, a reviewer, and human oversight. It improves technical proposals by actively challenging assumptions and identifying weaknesses in architectural designs before they are finalized.

Yes, you can use an iterative review process to refine an existing migration plan. The workflow supports continuous refinement by cycling through research, proposal, and adversarial review stages until the architectural document meets requirements.

The best way to manage RFCs and architectural documentation is through a multi-perspective workflow that separates research, proposal, and review phases. This structure streamlines creation and ensures robust critique through human-in-the-loop iteration.

Human oversight is built into the adversarial review loop to validate critiques and guide the architectural design iteration. While not every minor adjustment requires it, human-in-the-loop validation is essential for finalizing technical proposals.