skills.rest
Andreicr1
Andreicr1COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

design-lens-reviewer

Identify missing design decisions in planning documents and produce a structured gap report.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
Search Tags:#user-flows#design-review#information-architecture#planning-docs#interaction-states#ai-slop-risk#ux-gaps
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine --skill design-lens-reviewer-andreicr1
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-lens-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine/tree/main/.gemini/skills/design-lens-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine --skill design-lens-reviewer-andreicr1

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviews planning documents to identify missing design decisions that could block or derail implementation, focusing on information architecture, interaction states, user flows, and AI slop risk. It guides teams to close gaps before they become blockers, reducing rework and misaligned UX outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dimensional gap analysis across information architecture, interaction state coverage, user flows, and accessibility
  • Prioritized, actionable findings with clear next steps for product teams
  • Spawned by the document-review process to ensure plans are decision-complete before development begins

Quick Start

Review the provided planning document and return a prioritized gap report identifying missing information architecture, interaction states, and user flows, with actionable recommendations.

Frequently Asked Questions about design-lens-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify missing design decisions in planning documents?▼

A design gap analysis reviews early specs to find incomplete or skipped design decisions across information architecture, interaction states, user flows, and accessibility, preventing blockers and reducing UX rework before implementation begins.

How do I review early specs to find UX gaps before implementation?▼

You can review early specs by applying a dimensional gap analysis that highlights missing interaction states and user flows, returning a prioritized report that flags any design area rated 7/10 or below for immediate product team remediation.

What is AI slop risk in UX design reviews?▼

AI slop risk in design reviews is the danger of generating misaligned or generic UX outcomes from vague planning documents. Identifying missing design decisions early ensures plans are decision-complete and reduces rework.

Can I check if my planning documents are decision-complete for development?▼

You can check if planning documents are decision-complete by scanning for missing information architecture, incomplete interaction states, and skipped user flows, producing a dimensional rating report to guide actionable remediation.

What are the limitations of automated design gap analysis for early specs?▼

Automated design gap analysis is limited to highlighting missing or ambiguous decisions in existing planning docs; it cannot invent new design solutions. It functions as a remediation guide for product teams rather than a standalone design creator.

Related Skills

Explore More Design & Creative Skills→
algorithmbasicsalgorithmbasics

plan-design-review

Identify gaps and missing design decisions in design plans.

Community
Advanced
chuan-khunachuan-khuna
3

critique

Evaluate user interfaces across UX dimensions and deliver structured critique reports.

Community
Advanced
Sumeet138Sumeet138
1

context-driven-development

Create and maintain contextual artifacts in a conductor/ directory.

Community
Advanced
abhishekmmgnabhishekmmgn

plan-design-review

Analyze design plans across seven review passes and prompt for gaps.

Community
Advanced