design-principles-enforcer

You can audit code for SOLID, DRY, and KISS violations by running a structured architecture review that checks compliance against a design principles matrix and generates evidence-backed pass/fail reports with severity classifications.

Preventing design regressions during refactoring requires enforcing strict software design principles through automated audits that identify violations and produce prioritized, minimal-viable remediation plans to restore compliance.

Yes, you can perform a language-agnostic architecture review by evaluating implementation quality against established design principles like SOLID, DRY, KISS, LoD, DbC, and CQS without being tied to a specific programming language framework.

Yes, the design principles audit works across multiple scopes by analyzing architecture and implementation quality to produce pass/fail compliance reports for individual files, specific modules, or entire repositories.

To generate a remediation plan for Open/Closed Principle violations, audit the codebase to identify non-compliant architecture, then produce prioritized, minimal-viable fixes that restore extensibility and ensure the code passes design regression checks before merging.

You should avoid using an automated design principles enforcer when your codebase lacks sufficient architectural structure to evaluate, as the tool requires existing implementation quality to check against established design principles like SOLID and DRY.