design-review-cowork

A multi-perspective design review evaluates your prototype through UX, accessibility, performance, and business strategy lenses. You provide inputs like code, screenshots, or URLs to receive a unified readiness score and actionable fix instructions.

Yes, you can run a prototype design review using screenshots or URLs instead of source code. The analysis accepts various input formats including code, screenshots, and URLs to evaluate readiness across multiple expert perspectives.

A prototype readiness score is a unified metric generated by aggregating feedback from UX, accessibility, performance, and business strategy reviews. It provides actionable recommendations to inform your decision-making before launching a web app.

Yes, the multi-perspective prototype analysis explicitly covers accessibility and performance. It orchestrates expert reviews across six specialized areas including UX, accessibility, performance, and business strategy for a holistic evaluation.

The best way to evaluate a prototype before launch is to run a multi-perspective review that assesses UX, accessibility, performance, and business strategy. This provides a comprehensive readiness score with actionable fix instructions.

Automated design reviews provide multi-perspective feedback on prototypes using code, screenshots, or URLs, but they rely on the provided inputs. Complex business logic or dynamic interactions may require additional manual assessment beyond the generated readiness score.