design-review

Identify architectural and design quality issues in design documents.

1|Updated Dec 22, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Harries/hydpromptkit --skill design-review-harries
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-review
Source: https://github.com/Harries/hydpromptkit/tree/main/skills/design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Harries/hydpromptkit --skill design-review-harries

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

设计评审工作常常耗时且容易遗漏关键设计缺陷。该 Skill 提供结构化评审框架,帮助团队在设计阶段就发现架构、数据模型与接口层面的潜在问题,并提升设计质量和沟通效果。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 系统性评审:覆盖需求覆盖性、架构合理性、数据模型、接口设计、性能与安全等维度,减少返工。
  • 可追溯评审报告:提供逐维度评分、问题等级和改进建议,便于团队对齐与追踪。
  • Use Case:在设计阶段完成对关键设计决策的验证,确保实现对齐和风险可控。

Quick Start

将待评审的设计文档路径提交给系统,即可生成完整的评审报告。

Frequently Asked Questions about design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What does a systemized design review evaluate in an architecture document?

A design review identifies architectural and design quality issues in your design document. It evaluates requirements coverage, architecture rationality, data models, interfaces, and non-functional requirements to output actionable remediation suggestions.

How do I review an architecture document for requirement traceability and risk analysis?

Review an architecture document by submitting its file path to the system. It cross-references requirements, performs risk analysis, and generates a traceable review report with dimensional scores, issue severity levels, and improvement recommendations.

Can I use this design review process for data models and interface design?

Yes, you can use this design review for data models, interfaces, and non-functional requirements. It applies structured evaluation criteria to assess these components, ensuring design quality, requirement alignment, and risk control across engineering contexts.

What is the best way to identify non-functional requirement issues during a design review?

The best way to identify non-functional requirement issues is applying a structured evaluation framework. It systematically covers performance and security dimensions, enforces evaluation criteria, and provides traceable dimensional scores to improve team alignment.

How to generate a traceable review report with actionable remediation suggestions?

To generate a traceable review report, submit your design document for evaluation. The system outputs dimensional scores, issue levels, and actionable remediation suggestions, enabling teams to align on architectural quality and track improvements.