design-review

Audit live websites for visual issues and apply atomic code fixes.

Updated Apr 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/legotec73/gstack --skill design-review-legotec73
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-review
Source: https://github.com/legotec73/gstack/tree/main/design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/legotec73/gstack --skill design-review-legotec73

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Designers and engineers spend cycles chasing visual polish across live sites. This skill provides a structured audit workflow to identify typographic, spacing, hierarchy, and interaction inconsistencies, then fixes them with atomic commits and verifiable before/after screenshots.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Visual QA across pages and components to enforce typography, spacing, color contrast, and interaction polish.
  • Atomic fixes in source code with re-verification using before/after screenshots to ensure no regressions.
  • Design-system alignment and iterative polish for production sites, with a plan-mode option to audit before implementing.

Quick Start

Audit a live site for visual inconsistencies, fix issues in source with atomic commits, and verify results with before/after screenshots.

Frequently Asked Questions about design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a visual QA audit on a live website to catch spacing and typography issues?

Run a visual QA audit on a live website by scanning pages and components to identify typographic, spacing, hierarchy, and color contrast inconsistencies. The workflow applies fixes in source code and re-verifies results using before and after screenshots to prevent regressions.

Can I fix visual design issues directly in source code and verify them with diff screenshots?

You can fix visual design issues directly in source code with atomic commits and verify them with diff screenshots. The workflow captures before and after screenshots to re-verify that UI polish changes resolve the identified issues without introducing regressions.

What is the best way to check color contrast and design-system alignment across production pages?

The best way to check color contrast and design-system alignment across production pages is using a structured audit workflow. It enforces design-system alignment by verifying typography, spacing, and color contrast across components, then implements iterative polish with atomic commits.

Does the visual design review workflow support plan-mode to audit before implementing fixes?

The visual design review workflow supports plan-mode to audit before implementing fixes. This allows designers and engineers to review typographic and spacing inconsistencies across live sites first, then apply source code fixes with verifiable before and after screenshots.

How do I ensure pixel-perfect releases without introducing UI regressions during design polish?

Ensure pixel-perfect releases without UI regressions by applying atomic fixes in source code and re-verifying with before and after screenshots. This iterative workflow catches visual quality issues across pages and components to maintain production site polish.

What limitations exist when auditing live sites for visual quality issues and interaction polish?

Auditing live sites for visual quality issues requires access to the source code to apply atomic fixes. The workflow focuses on typography, spacing, color contrast, and interaction polish, relying on before and after diff screenshots to verify that changes resolve issues without regressions.