design-review

Audit live UI to detect visual inconsistencies and fix them atomically.

Updated Apr 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lyh2/gstack-deepseek --skill design-review-lyh2
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-review
Source: https://github.com/lyh2/gstack-deepseek/tree/main/design-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lyh2/gstack-deepseek --skill design-review-lyh2

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish". Proactively suggest when the user mentions visual inconsistencies or wants to polish the look of a live site.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Visual QA across live sites to detect inconsistencies in spacing, typography, hierarchy, and interaction latency.
  • Iterative fixes committed atomically with before/after verification to ensure traceability.
  • Plan-mode design review workflow for pre-implementation audits and proactive design polish suggestions.

Quick Start

Describe the target site and run the design-review workflow to start a visual QA pass.

Frequently Asked Questions about design-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a visual QA audit to find UI inconsistencies on my live site?

Visual QA audits live UI across sites to detect visual inconsistencies, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, and AI slop. You describe the target site and run the design-review workflow to start a visual QA pass that iteratively fixes issues in source code.

Can I review design polish before implementation using a plan-mode workflow?

Plan-mode design review supports pre-implementation audits and proactive design polish suggestions. Use the /plan-design-review workflow to audit designs before writing code, ensuring visual hierarchy and spacing issues are caught early.

What is the best way to fix AI slop and spacing issues in frontend code?

Fixing AI slop and spacing issues requires iteratively correcting source code and committing each fix atomically. The process re-verifies changes with before and after screenshots to ensure traceability and confirm the visual inconsistency is resolved.

Does this design review tool work with existing frontend design systems?

Yes, design review applies to live frontend sites to detect inconsistencies in typography, hierarchy, and interaction latency. It audits the rendered UI directly, so it works with any design system as long as the site is accessible.

When should I not use an automated visual QA approach for UI design polish?

Automated visual QA is not suited for purely aesthetic or subjective design explorations. It focuses on detecting specific visual inconsistencies, spacing problems, hierarchy issues, and slow interactions rather than evaluating creative design direction.

How does the before and after verification work for iterative UI fixes?

Before and after verification works by capturing screenshots before a fix is applied and after the source code change is committed atomically. This ensures each visual inconsistency fix is traceable and confirmed visually before moving to the next issue.