Execute a fleet of critics on code, diffs, or plan files.
npx skills add https://github.com/Tsadoq/claude-better-plan --skill design-review-tsadoq
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: design-review Source: https://github.com/Tsadoq/claude-better-plan/tree/main/skills/design-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Tsadoq/claude-better-plan --skill design-review-tsadoq
This Skill addresses the need for thorough design reviews of code, diffs, or plan files, providing an in-depth analysis to ensure adherence to design principles and identify potential issues.
Run a design review on the latest changes in the current branch:
/design-review
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To conduct a software design review, you can automate the process by running a fleet of parallel critics on your source code, diffs, or plan files to identify design flaws and validate adherence to software design principles.
Code analysis validates design principles derived from "A Philosophy of Software Design" by John Ousterhout, focusing on metrics like module depth, information hiding, and naming conventions to identify potential design flaws.
Yes, you can review Git diffs for design flaws by analyzing changes from specific commits or commit ranges. This Git integration allows targeted design validation on recent branch updates.
You can analyze plan files for software design quality by executing a critic fleet that evaluates the files against established design best practices and principles, ensuring structural soundness before implementation.
Yes, the design review process requires access to the source code and plan files to execute its critics and provide an in-depth analysis of module depth, information hiding, and overall design adherence.
The best way to automate design principle validation is executing a parallel critic fleet that assesses various aspects of design simultaneously, providing comprehensive identification of flaws across files or Git diffs.
4tieAnalyze codebases to produce architectural guidance, root-cause findings, and implementation plans.
manuelbrandner85Compare Trailmark code graphs across snapshots to detect security-relevant structural changes.
Ramprasad4121Prepare codebases for security review with static analysis and documentation.
novskidevCoordinates a structured 6-step response to code review feedback.