design-review

Run a visual audit on a live site by targeting a URL to identify visual polish opportunities. The review enforces a design-system alignment phase and a pixel-level audit to find spacing, hierarchy, and interaction state inconsistencies across your defined scope.

The best way to fix visual inconsistencies is through iterative source code corrections with atomic commits. After each fix, the workflow re-verifies the changes using before and after screenshots to ensure the visual polish is achieved without regressions.

Yes, you can check live site alignment using diff-aware audits on a feature branch. The review process includes a design-system alignment phase that checks typography and spacing against your defined scope before integration.

Visual QA supports plan-mode design reviews before implementation. You can generate actionable feedback for developers by using the dedicated plan-mode review workflow, which evaluates proposed designs without modifying source code.

Use a pixel-perfect design review when you need to catch AI slop patterns, slow interactions, and subtle visual inconsistencies. It enforces a structured workflow with before/after verification reports, going beyond general checks to iteratively fix issues in source code.

Before and after verification screenshots are required to validate iterative fixes in source code. This workflow commits each fix atomically and re-verifies the visual output, ensuring that design polish improvements are documented and regressions are caught immediately.