skills.rest
lukasdeveloperacc
lukasdeveloperaccCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

design-reviewer

Review Korean UX artifacts for usability, interaction, and design risks.

Updated Jun 7, 2026
Search Tags:#Codex#design analysis#risk assessment#UX review#Korean design
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lukasdeveloperacc/PersonalAgentPlugins --skill design-reviewer-lukasdeveloperacc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: design-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/lukasdeveloperacc/PersonalAgentPlugins/tree/main/codex/plugins/socrates-codex-partner-plugin/skills/design-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lukasdeveloperacc/PersonalAgentPlugins --skill design-reviewer-lukasdeveloperacc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the review of UX and design risks, enabling efficient analysis of Korean language artifacts without the need for source code edits.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Korean-first Design Review: Focuses on UX, IA, and design risk analysis in Korean.
  • Review Artifacts: Process requirements, screenshots, flows, or markdown without source code edits.
  • Use Case: A UX designer uses this Skill to review a new feature's design documentation in Korean, providing feedback on usability and design risks.

Quick Start

Use the design-reviewer skill to review the provided design documentation 'feature-design.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about design-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review Korean UX design documentation for usability risks?▼

You can review Korean UX design documentation for usability risks by processing requirements, screenshots, and markdown files through Codex to analyze user experience, interaction, and information architecture without editing source code.

Can I analyze design screenshots and flows in Korean without modifying source code?▼

Yes, you can analyze design screenshots and flows in Korean without modifying source code by submitting the artifacts directly to the Codex-based review process for natural language understanding and design risk assessment.

What is the best way to assess information architecture risks in Korean design artifacts?▼

The best way to assess information architecture risks in Korean design artifacts is to use Codex natural language processing to evaluate the UX documentation, identifying potential interaction and usability issues early in the design phase.

Does this design analysis process require Codex for evaluating Korean language UX artifacts?▼

Yes, evaluating Korean language UX artifacts requires Codex, as the design analysis and risk assessment process depends on its natural language understanding capabilities to interpret and review the documentation accurately.

What types of design files can I use for a UX review without source code edits?▼

You can use requirements documents, screenshots, user flows, and markdown files for a UX review without source code edits, allowing you to focus purely on design risk analysis and user experience feedback.

Are there limitations when using Codex for Korean design risk assessment?▼

A key limitation is that the Codex-based design risk assessment strictly requires Korean language artifacts to function correctly, and it focuses solely on UX analysis rather than implementing code-level fixes.

Related Skills

Explore More Design & Creative Skills→
ddarkrddarkr
5

oma-hwp

Convert HWP, HWPX, and HWPML files into Markdown or JSON.

Community
Intermediate
1IssaMohamed1IssaMohamed

critique

Evaluate interface designs and output structured UX critique reports.

Community
Advanced
ryosukesutoryosukesuto
1

create-pr

Create pull requests with titles, bodies, and analysis from git diffs.

Community
Advanced
specvitalspecvital
1

ui-ux-improve

Analyze UI/UX quality and generate actionable improvement recommendations.

Official
Advanced