design-system

To audit your design system, you evaluate naming consistency across tokens and components to prevent drift and identify gaps. This process ensures tokens and variants are documented properly, enforcing consistency across web and mobile interfaces.

The best way to document design tokens and component variants is by using structured documentation templates that capture accessibility notes and extension pathways. This approach ensures all products have consistent governance records for components and patterns.

You can extend a design system by proposing new patterns that fit the existing rules and governance checklists. This ensures newly added tokens and components maintain naming consistency and align with established accessibility documentation standards.

Yes, you can document accessibility notes for both web and mobile interfaces within a single design system. The documentation process supports capturing variants and tokens across different platforms to maintain unified accessibility standards.

Token and component duplication occurs because teams lack consistent governance checklists and documentation templates as the product portfolio grows. Auditing naming consistency and documenting gaps helps prevent this drift and confusion across products.

Design system governance checklists should include naming consistency audits for tokens, documentation for component variants, accessibility notes, and extension pathways. These elements ensure patterns remain consistent and prevent duplication across the portfolio.