Review codebases, architecture, API design, and UX flows with staged expert output.
npx skills add https://github.com/KBRglobal/advisiorai --skill dev-room
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: dev-room Source: https://github.com/KBRglobal/advisiorai/tree/main/skills/dev-room Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KBRglobal/advisiorai --skill dev-room
Provides a structured, adversarial technical review process that surfaces design flaws, performance risks, and unclear abstractions so teams can make concrete build-or-abandon decisions. It condenses diverse engineering philosophies into a single, prioritized output so you stop debating and start executing.
Paste your code or architecture spec and ask dev review to get a ten-expert critique with debate, hard questions, a risk map, confidence scores, a prioritized week-one plan, and concrete technical decisions.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
A structured architecture review synthesizes ten expert engineering perspectives into a staged output, surfacing design flaws and technical debt through debate, hard questions, and a risk map to deliver concrete build decisions. You trigger it by pasting architecture diagrams or specs.
An adversarial API design critique evaluates API specs by applying diverse engineering philosophies—like DX and systems perspectives—to expose tradeoffs and hidden risks. It produces confidence scoring, a prioritized week-one plan, and explicit technical decisions to stop debates and start executing.
Yes, a technical war room supports developer-experience audits and UI/UX flow reviews. It evaluates product specs and DX flows across web and backend contexts, generating interactive debates and a risk map that highlight performance risks and unclear abstractions.
Facilitate stack selection by submitting your options to an expert review process that generates initial reactions, interactive debates, and hard questions. This yields confidence scoring and explicit technical decisions, replacing endless team debates with a prioritized week-one plan.
You need an expert code review when standard static analysis cannot resolve architecture debates or unclear abstractions. It applies adversarial technical perspectives to code snippets, producing a risk map and concrete technical decisions that address design flaws and performance risks missed by automated tools.
wonderslifeValidate code changes against PRD-driven specs and acceptance criteria.
KBRglobalAnalyze moral dilemmas through multi-perspective philosopher debates and structured ethical deliverables.
LuisSambranoPerform systematic code review and static analysis across multiple programming languages.
guille-galloAutomate pre-commit hook setup with Husky and lint-staged for Git repositories.
