Dev10x-git-commit-split

Split monolithic git commits into atomic units with dependency ordering.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Brave-Labs/dev10x --skill dev10x-git-commit-split-brave-labs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Dev10x-git-commit-split
Source: https://github.com/Brave-Labs/dev10x/tree/main/codex-skills/dev10x-git-commit-split
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Brave-Labs/dev10x --skill dev10x-git-commit-split-brave-labs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires git, sed, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Monolithic commits are hard to review, test, and bisect. This skill provides a proven workflow to split large commits into atomic, cohesive units with a strict dependency order so each commit stands on its own and preserves a clear history.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Atomic commits that are self-contained and pass tests
  • Dependency-order splitting: utilities → data → refactoring → features → API
  • Keeps DTOs and related changes tied to the feature that uses them
  • Interactive rebase-based workflow with per-commit scope and test verification

Quick Start

Start an interactive rebase on the target branch, mark the monolithic commit for editing, then create atomic commits in dependency order and continue the rebase.

Frequently Asked Questions about Dev10x-git-commit-split

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I split a monolithic git commit into atomic commits?

You split a monolithic git commit by starting an interactive rebase, marking the commit for editing, then creating atomic commits in dependency order with test validation before continuing the rebase.

What is the correct dependency order for splitting git commits?

The dependency order for splitting git commits is utilities first, then data access, then refactoring, then features, and finally API layers, ensuring each commit stands on its own.

Why should I split large commits into atomic units for code review?

You split large commits into atomic units for code review because atomic commits are self-contained, pass tests independently, and preserve a clear history that is easier to review and bisect.

Do I need to validate tests after each atomic commit during an interactive rebase?

Yes, you need to validate tests after each atomic commit during an interactive rebase to ensure every split unit is cohesive, self-contained, and functionally correct.

Can I use interactive rebase to separate DTOs from feature changes in git?

Yes, you can use interactive rebase to separate DTOs from feature changes by keeping DTOs and related changes tied to the specific feature that uses them during the split.

What are the limitations of using interactive rebase for commit splitting?

Limitations of interactive rebase for commit splitting include requiring a strict rebase-based workflow and dependency ordering, which may struggle with deeply intertwined multi-change commits.