dev5-review

Review code changes for correctness, style, and risks, then generate feedback and a commit.

50|37|Updated Oct 8, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/browseros-ai/BrowserOS-agent --skill dev5-review-browseros-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dev5-review
Source: https://github.com/browseros-ai/BrowserOS-agent/tree/main/.claude/skills/dev5-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/browseros-ai/BrowserOS-agent --skill dev5-review-browseros-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enables teams to perform rigorous, structured code reviews that produce actionable feedback and standardized commits.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured review workflow: analyzes changed files for correctness, style, and safety concerns.
  • Comment and commit generation: creates review comments and a commit message summarizing changes.
  • Guided handoff: provides a clear handoff summary for DevOps or reviewers.

Quick Start

Review the latest PR using the dev5-review workflow to generate comments and a commit.

Frequently Asked Questions about dev5-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for a git feature branch?

Automating code review for a git feature branch requires analyzing changed files for correctness, style, and safety concerns, then generating actionable review comments and a standardized commit message summarizing the changes.

What do I need to generate actionable code review comments from a git diff?

Generating actionable code review comments from a git diff requires access to the diff output, PR context, and a design or PRD reference to evaluate correctness, style conformance, and potential risks.

Can I generate a commit message automatically after reviewing a pull request?

Yes, you can generate a commit message automatically after reviewing a pull request by applying a structured review workflow that analyzes changed files and produces both review comments and a standardized commit summarizing the changes.

Does automated code review work without a design or PRD reference?

Automated code review typically requires a design or PRD reference to properly evaluate correctness and style conformance against intended functionality, making it a necessary input for a rigorous review workflow.

What is the best way to ensure code quality and style across PR changes?

The best way to ensure code quality and style across PR changes is to implement a structured review workflow that evaluates correctness, style conformance, and potential risks, providing actionable feedback and a clear handoff summary for reviewers.

Why do I need PR context to check for security risks in my code changes?

You need PR context to check for security risks in your code changes because it provides the necessary background to evaluate correctness, style conformance, and potential safety concerns across the modified files within the software engineering project.