devbooks-proposal-challenger

Critique DevBooks change proposals and deliver an Approve, Revise, or Reject verdict.

84|6|Updated Jan 12, 2026

Search Tags:#verification #ethics #traceability #proposal #architecture-review #quality-review #risk-analysis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Darkbluelr/dev-playbooks-cn --skill devbooks-proposal-challenger

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: devbooks-proposal-challenger
Source: https://github.com/Darkbluelr/dev-playbooks-cn/tree/main/skills/devbooks-proposal-challenger
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Darkbluelr/dev-playbooks-cn --skill devbooks-proposal-challenger

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a rigorous critique of a proposal (proposal.md) by surfacing risks, gaps, inconsistencies, and missing acceptance criteria to ensure auditable, high-quality decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

Proposal critique: identify inconsistencies, gaps, dependencies, and missed constraints; deliver a structured critique with a final verdict (Approve | Revise | Reject) and actionable follow-ups.
Coverage discovery: reveal missing acceptance criteria, unaddressed boundary scenarios, rollback strategies, dependencies, and evidence points.
Evidence-driven guidance: indicate where to add evidence, tests, and validation artifacts within the change package.

Quick Start

Run the Challenger against proposal.md in the current change package to generate a formal critique and recommended actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about devbooks-proposal-challenger

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review a proposal for missing acceptance criteria and rollback plans?▼

To review a proposal for missing acceptance criteria and rollback plans, you can challenge the proposal document to surface gaps, boundary scenarios, and dependencies, resulting in a formal Approve, Revise, or Reject verdict with actionable follow-ups.

What is proposal risk analysis and how does it uncover architectural inconsistencies?▼

Proposal risk analysis is the process of critiquing a change proposal to uncover gaps, inconsistencies, and missing constraints. It ensures robust, auditable decisions by delivering a formal verdict and actionable follow-ups.

Does this proposal challenger work with DevBooks change packages?▼

Yes, this proposal challenger works directly with DevBooks change packages, focusing on acceptance criteria, boundary scenarios, rollback plans, dependencies, and evidence placement within the proposal.md file.

What is the best way to ensure traceability and ethics verification in a change proposal?▼

The best way to ensure traceability and ethics verification in a change proposal is to perform an architecture and quality review that surfaces missing evidence points and validation artifacts, delivering a formal verdict with required follow-ups.

When should I reject a proposal instead of requesting a revision?▼

You should reject a proposal when the critique reveals critical gaps, unacceptable risks, or missing rollback strategies that cannot be resolved through actionable follow-ups, whereas a Revise verdict applies when gaps can be addressed with additional evidence.