development-cycle

You can enforce a TDD workflow with code reviews and CI checks by following a structured development cycle that sequences implementation, automated CI, code review, action planning, and iterative fixes to produce a stable commit.

A standardized development workflow for CI-ready commits coordinates repeatable steps: implement with TDD, run CI, perform code review, create an action plan, apply fixes, and execute final CI before committing.

You integrate an optimization cycle by first following the normal implementation workflow to achieve CI-ready status, then switching to the optimization implementation mode to address performance bottlenecks through the same structured sequence.

Yes, the development cycle supports action planning before fixing code review feedback by requiring an action plan step after the initial review, followed by iterative fixes and a re-review phase until all feedback criteria are met.

Yes, you can use this workflow for both new feature implementation and performance optimization because it provides two distinct modes—normal implementation and optimization implementation—each with a repeatable sequence from development through CI and commit.

The best way to structure iterative code fixes is to follow a sequence of action planning, applying fixes, re-reviewing code, and running final CI checks, repeating until all feedback criteria are met and a stable commit is produced.