development-workflow

Multi-role development workflows are coordinated by enforcing structured role-based tasks for architects, developers, and QA engineers. This ensures traceability and accountability across planning, architecture design, code reviews, and QA validation through delivery.

Structured task execution for feature development is enforced by defining how each role mechanically executes a completed spec. The workflow automates issue and status management, design reviews, and documented completion summaries from planning through delivery.

Yes, you can manage architectural design reviews and QA validation within this workflow. The architect designs the technical approach and posts design documents, while the QA engineer reviews implementations against acceptance criteria and performs testing.

Role-based issue management works by assigning specific execution responsibilities to each role within a plan-heavy, execute-light cycle. Developers write code and post completion summaries, QA updates issue status, and UX/UI reviewers ensure usability to govern development cycles.

Yes, a completed feature spec and PRD are required before starting. By the time a task is assigned, the planning is done, and the workflow dictates the mechanical execution of the spec through architecture, implementation, and review phases.

The limitation of a plan-heavy, execute-light cycle is that it requires all planning and feature specs to be finalized upfront. It is not suited for exploratory development where requirements emerge dynamically during the execution phase.