devils-advocate

Generate 5-7 pedagogical challenges for slide deck designs.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gerhardriener/EC5230-industrial-organisation --skill devils-advocate-gerhardriener
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: devils-advocate
Source: https://github.com/gerhardriener/EC5230-industrial-organisation/tree/main/.claude/skills/devils-advocate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gerhardriener/EC5230-industrial-organisation --skill devils-advocate-gerhardriener

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This capability provides a structured framework to challenge slide deck designs with 5-7 targeted pedagogical questions, ensuring clarity and coherence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Generates 5-7 explicit challenges across categories such as ordering, prerequisites, gaps, alternatives, notation conflicts, cognitive load, and book-readiness.
  • Produces a structured, actionable output including a short summary verdict and suggested resolutions.
  • Supports review sessions for individual lectures or entire courses to improve narrative continuity and assessment alignment.

Quick Start

Provide the target slide deck title or filename to generate 5–7 pedagogical challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions about devils-advocate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a slide deck for pedagogical quality and narrative coherence?

Pedagogical review for slide decks involves challenging the design with 5-7 targeted questions covering ordering, prerequisites, gaps, notation conflicts, and cognitive load. It provides a structured output with categorized challenges and a summary verdict.

How do I check my lecture slides for cognitive load and prerequisite gaps?

You check lecture slides for cognitive load and prerequisite gaps by generating 5-7 targeted pedagogical questions that verify ordering, identify gaps, and assess readiness. This yields a structured output with categorized challenges and suggested resolutions.

Can I use a structured critique to verify course sequence and assessment alignment?

Using structured pedagogical critique verifies course sequence and assessment alignment by generating 5-7 challenges across categories like ordering, gaps, and readiness. It produces a summary verdict and suggested resolutions to improve narrative continuity.

What is the best way to challenge slide deck ordering and notation conflicts?

The best way to challenge slide deck ordering and notation conflicts is to generate 5-7 explicit pedagogical questions targeting those categories. This produces a structured output with categorized challenges, a summary verdict, and suggested resolutions.

Does pedagogical peer review work for individual lectures and entire courses?

Pedagogical peer review works for individual lectures and entire courses by applying 5-7 targeted challenges to verify ordering, prerequisites, and readiness. It produces a structured output with a summary verdict and suggested resolutions for quick review.