dew-fast

Implement small software features by running a compressed plan, build, and verify workflow that establishes measurable acceptance tests before coding. This approach skips the full six-stage process while maintaining engineering discipline through incremental validation.

Use a compressed plan-build-verify workflow when requirements are reasonably clear and the implementation effort is small enough to avoid a full six-stage process. It is ideal for scoped features like a small API endpoint, utility module, or tool.

Convert requirements into measurable acceptance tests during the planning stage by defining concrete, testable success criteria before implementation begins. This ensures the build phase has explicit assumptions and the verify phase checks against plan-defined criteria.

No, this software workflow runs empirical validation checks only when genuine pre-implementation blockers exist or when verifying completion against acceptance criteria. This keeps lightweight validation focused on critical milestones rather than continuous overhead.

Structure software implementation planning for small API endpoints by defining production-oriented structure before coding, then executing deterministic phases driven by the orchestrator state. This ensures the build phase follows a defined plan rather than ad-hoc development.

No, this incremental validation workflow is designed for smaller software tasks where requirements are reasonably clear. Large scale projects require the full six-stage engineering process to handle complexity that exceeds the compressed plan-build-verify scope.