Coordinate two AI reviewers to debate code diffs and produce a structured verdict.
npx skills add https://github.com/v1r3n/dinesh-gilfoyle --skill dg
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: dg Source: https://github.com/v1r3n/dinesh-gilfoyle/tree/main/dg Command: npx skills add https://github.com/v1r3n/dinesh-gilfoyle --skill dg
Use when the user wants an entertaining yet rigorous adversarial code review experience where two silicon valley personas critique code as a dynamic duo, surfacing issues that might be missed in traditional reviews.
Invoke the /dg command to start an adversarial two-agent code review against the current changes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Run an adversarial code review by invoking the /dg command against your current changes. The skill coordinates two AI agents in a debate to surface vulnerabilities, design flaws, and maintainability issues from your diffs or files.
An adversarial two-agent code review uses two AI personas to critique your code from opposing perspectives. This skill orchestrates context gathering, dependency checks, and debate rounds to expose security gaps and architectural flaws that traditional reviews miss.
Yes, you can apply this adversarial review skill to specific files or git diffs. It processes the provided code changes and orchestrates a dual-agent debate to deliver a structured final verdict with actionable fixes.
No external dependencies are required to run this code review skill. It operates independently to orchestrate the end-to-end workflow including context gathering, debate rounds, and generating a structured final verdict.
Adversarial AI code review uses a dual-agent debate format rather than static analysis. This dynamic surfaces vulnerabilities and maintainability concerns through character-based critique, producing a structured verdict with actionable fixes derived from the debate transcript.
Avoid dual-agent adversarial code reviews when you need a quick, silent pass or basic linting. The skill orchestrates full debate rounds and context gathering, making it better suited for rigorous, deep analysis of vulnerabilities and architectural flaws.
westnReview, challenge, or consult code diffs using the Codex CLI.
PthahnixCoordinate a structured multiagent debate to validate a research gap.
winsorllcExecute linters, static analysis, and security scanners on code.
opensage-agentOrchestrate parallel sub-agent execution for multi-model consensus and disagreement detection.
