dhdna-profiler

To extract cognitive patterns from writing, you can use a DHDNA 12-dimension profiling approach that scores dimensions like Analytical Depth and Intuitive Reasoning using explicit textual evidence. This process turns unstructured language into a structured cognitive fingerprint.

Yes, you can compare decision-making tendencies by using a comparison mode that profiles multiple texts. It summarizes where cognitive styles converge and diverge, mapping tension pairs to predict what an interaction between the two authors would look like.

A cognitive fingerprint is a structured profile of an individual's thinking patterns extracted from text. It maps reasoning topology by identifying structures like linear, spiral, web, dialectic, or fractal, alongside dominant and shadow cognitive patterns.

You can profile your own thinking style by running a self-profile mode on your conversation history. It analyzes your text to score 12 cognitive dimensions while providing transparency about how representative the sampled text is of your overall reasoning.

No, cognitive profiling via text analysis does not judge reasoning as good or bad. It strictly identifies decision-making tendencies and tension-pair signatures, converting the provided writing or speech-like content into an objective cognitive fingerprint.

To identify a decision fingerprint through writing forensics, you need to provide a sufficient sample of an author's text or speech-like content. The profiling relies on explicit textual evidence to score 12 dimensions and map the dominant and shadow cognitive patterns.