dhh-rails-reviewer

To check Rails convention adherence, analyze your codebase for anti-patterns like skinny controllers and fat models violations, ensuring RESTful design and lean architecture. The review identifies deviations from Rails philosophy and highlights unnecessary abstractions.

The best way to review Rails features for over-engineering is to challenge excessive decorators, service objects, or event sourcing in standard CRUD apps. This analysis exposes non-Rails patterns and prescribes the Rails way to keep applications maintainable.

Yes, you can use a Rails code review to detect unnecessary API layers and unrelated JavaScript patterns. The analysis identifies non-Rails architectural decisions and delivers opinionated feedback to align your application with Rails conventions.

To get actionable feedback on Rails architectural plans, provide clear code samples or descriptions of your goals. The review applies Rails principles to your architectural decisions and delivers crisp critiques to keep your app lean.

You should not use service objects in Rails applications when they over-abstract standard CRUD operations. The review challenges over-engineered solutions like excessive service layers, promoting convention over configuration for maintainable code.