diagnostics

To retrieve LSP diagnostics, run a full scan across changed project files. The scan collects syntax, type, and import errors, returning a file-scoped diagnostic list to speed up debugging and validate post-change code quality.

The best way to suggest a rollback is generating a concise, user-facing reason for the failure and prompting a checkpoint-based rollback UI action. This ensures safe reversion to a known good state without automatically applying the rollback.

Yes, you can check for type errors in a specific file. The diagnostics tool collects LSP-reported syntax, type, and import errors for individual files after edits, helping you validate targeted changes quickly.

You need a checkpoint-based rollback flow when a large refactor or dependency upgrade causes widespread static errors. It guides you to safely revert changes to a known good checkpoint when progress is completely blocked.

No, the rollback suggestion does not execute automatically. It generates a concise user-facing reason and prompts a checkpoint-based rollback UI action, requiring manual confirmation to safely revert the changes.

Post-change validation checks fail because the dependency upgrade introduced syntax, type, or import errors. Run LSP diagnostics to list these static analysis failures by file, then fix targeted issues or suggest reverting.