diagnostics

Retrieve LSP diagnostics and suggest rollbacks to stable project states.

Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TheTesseractAI/19 --skill diagnostics-thetesseractai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: diagnostics
Source: https://github.com/TheTesseractAI/19/tree/main/.local/skills/diagnostics
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TheTesseractAI/19 --skill diagnostics-thetesseractai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps developers identify static code errors and efficiently revert project states to resolve issues quickly.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • LSP Diagnostics Retrieval: Check for syntax, type, and import errors in code files to identify static issues.
  • Project Rollback Suggestions: Recommend reverting to previous stable project states when critical errors are detected or after problematic changes.
  • Use Case: When a developer makes a major refactor that introduces errors, this Skill can identify the specific issues and suggest potential rollbacks to a validated version, saving time on manual debugging.

Quick Start

Use the diagnostics skill to review the latest static errors and advise on project rollback if necessary.

Frequently Asked Questions about diagnostics

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check for static code errors using LSP diagnostics?

To check for static code errors using LSP diagnostics, retrieve syntax, type, and import errors directly from the language server protocol integration. This identifies specific static issues in your code files for review.

What is the best way to revert project changes after a problematic refactor?

The best way to revert project changes after a problematic refactor is to use project rollback suggestions. It recommends reverting to previous stable project states when critical errors are detected, saving manual debugging time.

Can I use this to identify syntax and type errors in my code files?

Yes, you can use this to identify syntax and type errors in your code files. It retrieves LSP diagnostics to pinpoint static issues, helping developers catch errors efficiently before runtime.

Does this require integration with project checkpoint systems?

Yes, this requires integration with project checkpoint systems and language server protocols. These integrations provide the necessary static error diagnostics and historical project states for rollback suggestions.

Why should I consider a project rollback instead of manual debugging?

You should consider a project rollback instead of manual debugging when a major refactor introduces critical errors. Suggesting reverts to a validated version quickly resolves issues that would otherwise consume extensive manual debugging time.

What are the limitations of relying on LSP diagnostics for code review?

A limitation of relying on LSP diagnostics for code review is that it only catches static code errors like syntax and type issues. It does not resolve runtime logic errors, requiring checkpoint systems for state reversion.