diary

Document engineering rationale by creating a structured implementation diary that records what changed, why it was done, and what failed. This enforces a consistent file location and step-wise guidance to produce an auditable narrative history.

The best way to capture an implementation narrative is using a structured diary workflow with frontmatter-defined entries. It applies during bug fixes and refactors to log outcomes and rationale, creating a living history for debugging and knowledge transfer.

Structure engineering documentation for traceability by creating a diary file under a docs directory using a date-based filename and descriptive slug. Start the narrative with a prescribed step structure to maintain chronological record consistency.

You need to create an implementation diary entry during non-trivial engineering work such as new features, bug fixes, or refactors. It should also be applied at natural session ends or work chunk completions to capture milestones for auditing.

Yes, the implementation diary supports knowledge transfer during code reviews by providing a structured template. It documents what was done, why it was done, and what needs verification, aiding reviewers in understanding the work context.

To ensure an engineering work diary is auditable, include what changed, the rationale for why it was done, what worked, what failed, and what needs review. This structured narrative creates a verifiable history of features, fixes, and refactors.