diebolt

Coordinate simulated peer review of economics papers with iterative referee rounds.

35|9|Updated Mar 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/johanfourieza/econtools --skill diebolt
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: diebolt
Source: https://github.com/johanfourieza/econtools/tree/main/diebolt
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/johanfourieza/econtools --skill diebolt

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Diebolt addresses the time-consuming and subjective nature of expert peer review by simulating a panel of referees that independently evaluate and revise an economics manuscript.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated referee generation: creates independent referee personas with distinct expertise and biases to review a paper.
  • Iterative revision rounds: editor synthesizes feedback and guides revisions until publication-ready.
  • Codex-assisted auditing: if Codex is available, provides methodology auditing and R script verification by a second model family (GPT-5.4).

Quick Start

Initiate a review round by providing the target paper and running the Diebolt workflow to begin iterative simulated reviews.

Frequently Asked Questions about diebolt

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does simulated peer review for economics working papers work?

Simulated peer review works by generating multiple independent referee personas with distinct expertise and biases to evaluate an economics manuscript, followed by iterative revision rounds guided by an editor until the paper is publication-ready.

Can I verify R scripts and methodology during an automated peer review?

Yes, you can verify R scripts and methodology during automated peer review if Codex is available, which provides external auditing by a second model family to cross-check computational outputs and analytical approaches.

How do I simulate an editorial verdict for my economics manuscript?

You simulate an editorial verdict by providing your target economics paper to an orchestration workflow where an editor persona synthesizes iterative feedback from diverse referee profiles into a formal structured response.

What is the best way to get independent referee feedback on an economics paper?

The best way to get independent referee feedback is using an automated referee generation process that creates diverse reviewer personas to independently evaluate and suggest revisions for your economics manuscript.

Do I need external dependencies to run an iterative referee revision workflow?

No external dependencies are required to run iterative referee revision workflows, though enabling optional Codex-assisted auditing provides additional methodology verification and R script output checks if available.