diff-review

To consolidate multi-agent code reviews into a unified report, coordinate reviewers like Gemini, Codex, and Claude to merge findings with attribution. This process deduplicates overlapping issues and saves a single stakeholder-ready report to disk.

The best way to review large diffs across multiple services is running parallel multi-agent reviews. This accelerates feedback and coordinates merging to deduplicate findings while preserving source attribution for a unified report.

Yes, you can run Gemini, Codex, and Claude in parallel for code review. The coordinated merging process deduplicates their findings while preserving source attribution to generate a single unified report.

Expertise auto-detection for diff code review works by tailoring reviewer prompts based on the specific content of the changes. This ensures the multi-agent analysis is appropriately scoped before merging into a final report.

When merging multi-agent code review findings, the main constraint is ensuring accurate source attribution during deduplication. The process is designed for diffs across multiple files or services to produce a unified report without losing distinct reviewer insights.

Yes, you can add new reviewer prompts to an automated multi-agent code review. The system supports extensibility, allowing you to easily introduce new reviewer expertise alongside existing coordinated agents.