diff-scope-minimizer

Plan 3–5 step patches with diff-size estimates and stop criteria.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MacroMan5/claude-code-workflow-plugins --skill diff-scope-minimizer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: diff-scope-minimizer
Source: https://github.com/MacroMan5/claude-code-workflow-plugins/tree/main/.claude/skills/diff-scope-minimizer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MacroMan5/claude-code-workflow-plugins --skill diff-scope-minimizer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Large, sprawling code changes are hard to review, introduce more bugs, and increase deployment risk. This Skill enforces minimal, focused modifications.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiny Patch Plans: Proposes a 3-5 step patch plan with specific target files, ensuring changes are narrowly scoped.
  • Diff Size Estimation & Stop Criteria: Estimates the expected diff size (files/lines) and defines clear stop criteria to prevent scope creep.
  • Use Case: Before starting a refactor or bug fix, use this skill to plan the smallest possible change, ensuring you only touch relevant files and meet strict stop criteria, reducing overall risk.

Quick Start

Plan the smallest patch to fix the null handling bug in 'src/data_processor.py', aiming for a diff of less than 20 lines.

Frequently Asked Questions about diff-scope-minimizer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I minimize diff size when making code changes?

Minimize diff size by creating a focused 3–5 step patch plan targeting only relevant files, estimating expected lines changed, and defining clear stop criteria before you start. Re-evaluate after each step and halt when criteria are met to keep changes small and reviewable.

What's the best way to plan a refactoring to reduce risk?

Plan refactoring as a minimal patch by identifying target files upfront, setting a diff-size ceiling, and committing to stopping when that limit is reached. This approach reduces review burden and deployment risk by keeping scope deliberately constrained.

How do I avoid scope creep when fixing bugs?

Define stop criteria before patching—such as max line count or file count—and re-evaluate after each change step. Pause if the diff grows beyond 2× your estimate, and avoid touching unrelated files to keep the fix focused and low-risk.

Can I use patch planning for large refactors?

Patch planning works best for focused changes, not large refactors. Break sprawling refactors into multiple small patches, each with its own 3–5 step plan and diff-size target, to keep individual patches reviewable and deployable independently.

Why does diff size matter for code review?

Smaller diffs are easier to review thoroughly, introduce fewer hidden bugs, and lower deployment risk. Diff-size estimation and stop criteria enforce discipline, preventing reviewers from missing issues in oversized, unfocused changes.

What should I do if my patch exceeds the estimated diff size?

Stop and re-evaluate. If the diff grows beyond 2× your estimate, pause the current step, identify scope creep, remove unrelated changes, or split the work into separate smaller patches with tighter stop criteria.