diff-summary

Generate structured, intent-based summaries of code changes for review.

Updated Jun 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kekemoto/skills --skill diff-summary-kekemoto
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: diff-summary
Source: https://github.com/kekemoto/skills/tree/main/skills/diff-summary
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kekemoto/skills --skill diff-summary-kekemoto

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the problem of opaque or poorly documented code changes by forcing a structured, intent-based reporting format that ensures reviewers understand the "why" behind the "what."

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Reporting: Enforces a specific template covering intent, design decisions, test coverage, and risks.
  • Auditability: Shifts the focus from raw diff dumps to verifiable outcomes and honest risk assessment.
  • Use Case: After completing a complex refactor, use this skill to generate a professional summary that highlights the design trade-offs and unverified edge cases for your team's review.

Quick Start

Invoke the diff-summary skill to generate a structured report of the recent changes in the current branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about diff-summary

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate an audit-ready summary of my code changes?

To generate an audit-ready code change summary, invoke the diff-summary skill to automatically create a structured report covering design intent, test coverage, and risk assessment for your recent branch changes.

What is the best way to document design decisions for a code review?

Documenting design decisions for a code review requires a structured reporting format that distinguishes the 'why' from the 'what', shifting focus from raw diff dumps to verifiable outcomes and honest risk assessment.

How do I create a structured git diff report that highlights unverified edge cases?

You can create a structured git diff report that highlights unverified edge cases by applying a specific template that enforces intent-based reporting, ensuring reviewers understand design trade-offs and unverified assumptions.

Does this reporting approach work for complex software refactoring workflows?

Yes, this reporting approach works for complex software refactoring workflows by applying standardized reporting that improves auditability and ensures clear communication of design decisions after implementation.

When do I need to use an intent-based code change summary?

You need an intent-based code change summary when your software engineering workflow requires standardized reporting to distinguish between verified behavior and unverified assumptions for team review.

What is the difference between a raw git diff and an audit-ready code report?

A raw git diff provides unstructured code changes, whereas an audit-ready code report enforces a specific template covering intent, design decisions, test coverage, and risks to improve overall auditability.