What problem does it solve?
Differential security reviews can miss real risk when changes are small, familiarity biases the analysis, or teams skip hard evidence like git history, line numbers, and test gaps—this skill helps produce a complete, risk-first security review artifact for PRs and diffs.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Risk-First Differential Review: Prioritizes auth, crypto, external calls, value transfer, and validation removal over change size.
- Evidence-Based Findings: Uses git history and blamed removed code to support concrete, actionable security claims.
- End-to-End Workflow & Reporting: Runs the full phase sequence (triage → analysis → test coverage → blast radius → adversarial for HIGH risk → report) and ensures the final markdown report artifact is generated.
- Use Cases: Review security-sensitive PRs, analyze commit/diff regressions in critical code paths, and produce stakeholder-ready audit reports with severity and recommendations.
Quick Start
Use the differential-review skill to perform a full evidence-based security review of the changed code and generate the required markdown report for your PR or commit range.