differential-review

Review code diffs for security risks and regressions with markdown reports.

Updated Mar 17, 2026

Search Tags:#security #diff #pr #code-review #git-history #blast-radius #risk-analysis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Avi977/ace-claude-toolkit --skill differential-review-avi977

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: differential-review
Source: https://github.com/Avi977/ace-claude-toolkit/tree/main/skills/differential-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Avi977/ace-claude-toolkit --skill differential-review-avi977

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Security-focused differential review of code changes to identify regressions and security risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

Risk-first review focusing on auth, crypto, value transfer, and external calls
Adaptive depth leveraging codebase size (SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE) and git history for context
Generates comprehensive markdown reports with concrete findings and blast-radius calculations

Quick Start

Run a differential-security-review on a PR and generate a complete markdown report.

Frequently Asked Questions about differential-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a security-focused code review on a PR?▼

Security-focused code review on a PR analyzes diffs to identify regressions and risks. It adapts review depth based on codebase size and uses git history for context to produce a detailed markdown report with blast-radius calculations.

What is blast-radius calculation in differential code review?▼

Blast-radius calculation in differential code review measures the potential impact of code changes across the codebase. It evaluates the scope of regressions and security risks by analyzing diffs and git history to produce risk-based triage evidence.

How do I check test coverage during a git diff security analysis?▼

Test coverage checks during git diff security analysis verify existing tests against modified code. The differential review process evaluates coverage alongside risk-based triage and blast-radius calculations to ensure regressions are caught.

Does adaptive code review work for large codebases?▼

Adaptive code review works for large codebases by scaling review depth according to size classifications like SMALL, MEDIUM, and LARGE. It leverages git history for context to maintain accurate risk-analysis and regression detection.

Can I use git history to find security regressions in commits?▼

Git history can be used to find security regressions in commits by providing contextual background for differential review. This approach traces code changes over time to identify risk patterns in auth, crypto, and external calls.

What is the best way to generate a risk-analysis report for code changes?▼

The best way to generate a risk-analysis report for code changes is performing a differential review that integrates audit-context-building and issue-writer workflows. It outputs a comprehensive markdown report with concrete findings and line-number references.

edobry

review-pr

Analyze pull requests and post structured GitHub PR reviews.

Community

Advanced

MetalLegBob