differential-review

Security-focused code review on git diffs is performed by analyzing commit history and blast radius to detect regressions, building evidence-backed markdown reports with remediation recommendations.

Blast radius analysis in code diffs measures the potential impact scope of changes by leveraging git history to prioritize security findings and identify regressions across the project.

Markdown reports for security regressions in pull requests are generated through phase-based differential analysis of code changes, producing formal evidence-driven documents with exploit scenarios and coverage details.

Differential review can be used for large scale codebases and complex commits, adapting the analysis depth based on codebase complexity to ensure consistent security gap detection across varying project sizes.

Adversarial modeling works with standard git history by analyzing code diffs and context to build concrete exploit scenarios, enabling evidence-backed vulnerability detection and regression identification.

The best way to triage security gaps in code commits is applying a structured phase-based analysis workflow from pre-analysis through adversarial modeling, leveraging evidence-driven diff context to prioritize findings.