differential-review

To audit code changes for security risks in a git diff, you perform a security-focused differential review across PRs and commits to generate comprehensive markdown reports with explicit risk and remediation recommendations.

Differential code review analyzes code changes against baseline invariants and trust boundaries to uncover regressions and attack surfaces. You need it for security-conscious code governance to assess changes across PRs, commits, and diffs.

To generate an audit-ready report for a pull request, orchestrate a phase-driven workflow from intake to final reporting, applying adversarial modeling to produce structured markdown audit reports with blast radius analysis.

Yes, you can use git history to establish contextual baselines for code review by capturing invariants, trust boundaries, and validation patterns from historical commits to prevent security regressions in new changes.

Differential review scales with large codebase sizes by applying phase-based analysis across the workflow, ensuring thorough security assessment of diffs and commits without being overwhelmed by the volume of code changes.

The best way to uncover attack surfaces introduced by recent commits is to apply rapid adversarial modeling and generate concrete exploit scenarios during the differential review of code changes.