differential-review

Differential code review automates security analysis of git pull requests by comparing code differences, calculating blast radius, and checking test coverage to detect introduced vulnerabilities. It flags security risks like access control issues before merging.

Differential code review for regression detection analyzes git history to identify if security fixes are being undone. It adapts analysis depth to codebase size and generates markdown reports to prevent security regressions in new commits.

Yes, automated security audits check smart contract changes by performing differential analysis on commits. This identifies potential reentrancy, access control, or validation issues introduced by modifications to critical contract logic.

Yes, differential review works with large codebases by adapting analysis depth to codebase size. It utilizes git history for context to ensure comprehensive security checks regardless of the scale of the code changes.

To generate a security report for the latest commit, run a differential review on the code changes. The review calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and outputs a comprehensive markdown report detailing detected security vulnerabilities.

The best way to prevent security regressions in code is to perform security-focused differential review on all changes. By utilizing git history for context, this approach detects when existing security measures are undone before code is merged.