_discuss

Guide structured workflow discussions by challenging assumptions and clarifying requirements.

Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HahyeonJeon/gobbi --skill discuss-hahyeonjeon
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: _discuss
Source: https://github.com/HahyeonJeon/gobbi/tree/main/plugins/gobbi/skills/_discuss
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HahyeonJeon/gobbi --skill discuss-hahyeonjeon

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Critical, structured discussion is essential for achieving high-quality workflow decisions. This skill guides agents to challenge assumptions, surface ambiguities, and push for precise requirements to prevent misalignment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured questioning across key dimensions (Problem, Deliverable, Scope, Priority, Approach, Constraints, Risks, Dependencies, Verification) to reduce ambiguity.
  • Opinionated guidance with recommended options when appropriate, plus constructive challenge of vague answers.
  • Consistent use of AskUserQuestion to gather specific prompts and maintain decision defensibility.

Quick Start

AskUserQuestion to clarify each unclear dimension at the start of a workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about _discuss

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I clarify ambiguous project requirements during the ideation and planning phases?

To clarify ambiguous project requirements, you need structured dialogue that challenges assumptions and solicits precise inputs across dimensions like scope, priority, and constraints. This ensures vague specifications are resolved before workflow execution begins.

What is structured dialogue for decision-making and when should I use it?

Structured dialogue for decision-making is a framework that guides agents to critically question assumptions and surface trade-offs across key project dimensions. Use it during ideation, planning, execution, feedback, and review to prevent misalignment in real-world projects.

How do I conduct a critical discussion to resolve vague specifications and trade-offs?

Conduct a critical discussion by applying a dimension-based framework that questions problem definitions, deliverables, scope, and risks. Use structured prompts to gather specific answers and push back on vague inputs to maintain decision defensibility.

Can I use structured questioning to challenge assumptions during workflow execution?

Yes, you can use structured questioning during workflow execution to challenge assumptions and surface ambiguities. Applying consistent prompts across key dimensions ensures that trade-offs and dependencies are continuously verified throughout the project lifecycle.

Does structured discussion work for resolving scope and priority conflicts in product management?

Structured discussion works effectively for resolving scope and priority conflicts in product management by evaluating constraints, dependencies, and risks. It provides opinionated guidance with recommended options to push for precise requirements and resolve trade-offs.