discuss-review

To create a structured markdown brief for an external code review, invoke the skill with your target file details and review questions. It automatically generates a standardized markdown briefing and a ready-to-copy prompt to guide the reviewer through verification and critique steps.

A multi-round critique workflow is a structured review process that supports iterative feedback cycles for technical reviews and peer sessions. You need it when requesting expert reviews of project files to ensure clear, organized, and reproducible critique sessions across multiple revisions.

Yes, this markdown review brief generator works for technical audits, code reviews, and peer feedback sessions. It produces detailed, standardized markdown briefs that specify target files and review questions, ensuring clear communication and traceability throughout the critique cycle.

Yes, you can use this to prepare documentation for a reviewer agent to critique. It generates a formatted trigger and a markdown brief that guides the reviewer agent through file verification and critique steps, ensuring clarity and traceability throughout the critique cycle.

The best way to automate project file critique requests is to use a skill that generates standardized markdown briefs with ready-to-copy prompts. This approach specifies target files and review questions, guiding external reviewers through a structured, multi-round critique workflow.

The limitation of using markdown briefs for multi-round review workflows is that the skill only generates the briefing document and reviewer prompt. It does not perform the actual critique itself, requiring an external reviewer or agent to execute the verification and feedback steps.