dispatching-parallel-agents

Dispatch concurrent agents to fix independent test failures across separate problem domains.

Updated Jun 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gyc-12/Archipelago --skill dispatching-parallel-agents-gyc-12
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dispatching-parallel-agents
Source: https://github.com/gyc-12/Archipelago/tree/main/modules/collaboration-runtime/src-tauri/experts/skills/dispatching-parallel-agents
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gyc-12/Archipelago --skill dispatching-parallel-agents-gyc-12

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? When multiple unrelated test failures or bugs appear across different files and subsystems, investigating them sequentially wastes time. This Skill guides you to split independent problems into focused agent tasks that run concurrently, each with isolated context. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Domain Identification: Group failures by root cause to determine which problems are truly independent and safe to parallelize. - Focused Agent Prompts: Structure each agent task with specific scope, clear goals, constraints, and expected output summaries. - Integration Review: Verify agent fixes don't conflict, run the full test suite, and spot-check for systematic errors. - Use Case: After a major refactoring leaves 6 failures across 3 test files (abort logic, batch completion, race conditions), dispatch three agents in parallel—one per file—and integrate their independent fixes with zero conflicts. ## Quick Start Ask the AI to dispatch one parallel agent per failing test file, giving each agent the error messages, scope constraints, and a request for a summary of root cause and fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about dispatching-parallel-agents

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix multiple failing tests in parallel with AI agents?

Group failures by root cause into independent domains, then dispatch one agent per domain with a focused prompt containing the error messages, scope constraints, and expected output. Each agent works concurrently with isolated context, and you integrate their fixes afterward.

When should I use parallel agents instead of sequential debugging?

Use parallel agents when failures are independent—different test files, subsystems, or bugs with no shared state. Avoid parallel dispatch when failures are related, when understanding requires full system context, or when agents would edit the same files.

What makes a good agent prompt for fixing test failures?

A good agent prompt is focused on one problem domain, self-contained with pasted error messages and test names, explicit about constraints like not changing production code, and specific about the expected output such as a summary of root cause and changes.

Can parallel agents conflict with each other when editing code?

Yes, conflicts occur if agents share state or edit the same files. Prevent this by assigning each agent a distinct problem domain and file scope, then after they return, review summaries, check for overlapping edits, and run the full test suite.

What are common mistakes when dispatching debugging agents?

Common mistakes include overly broad scopes like fixing all tests at once, missing context such as error messages, absent constraints letting agents refactor unrelated code, and vague output requirements that hide what actually changed.