dissertation-critic

Review dissertation chapters for argument validity, evidence quality, and methodological rigor.

12|4|Updated Jan 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/heaversm/ralph-storywriter --skill dissertation-critic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dissertation-critic
Source: https://github.com/heaversm/ralph-storywriter/tree/main/.claude/skills/dissertation-critic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/heaversm/ralph-storywriter --skill dissertation-critic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you critically evaluate dissertation chapters before they move forward, so weak arguments, unsupported claims, literature gaps, and methodological problems are caught early instead of compounding across the full project.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Argument Review: Assesses whether the chapter's core claim is clear, defensible, significant, and connected to the dissertation thesis.
  • Evidence and Literature Evaluation: Checks source quality, fairness of representation, adequacy of support, and engagement with relevant scholarly conversations.
  • Structured Academic Feedback: Produces a chapter review with prioritized issues, strengths, acceptance-criteria checks, and a pass or revision recommendation.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill when a dissertation chapter draft is complete and you need committee-style feedback on argument quality, methodological rigor, and scholarly standards before revising or approving the chapter.

Quick Start

Ask the dissertation-critic skill to review chapter 3 of your dissertation project and generate a revision-focused committee-style assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about dissertation-critic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a dissertation chapter for argument validity and methodological rigor?

Dissertation chapter review evaluates argument validity, evidence quality, and methodological rigor by reading the target draft, framework, and literature files to produce structured committee-style feedback for revision planning.

What is academic chapter feedback and how does it check thesis alignment?

Academic chapter feedback assesses whether a chapter's core claim is defensible, significant, and connected to the dissertation thesis. It checks literature engagement and source quality to produce a pass or revision recommendation.

Can I get literature evaluation and evidence quality checks for a scholarly writing draft?

Literature evaluation checks source quality, fairness of representation, and adequacy of support for scholarly writing. It characterizes literature files and identifies gaps in engagement with relevant scholarly conversations.

What's the best way to generate structured revision plans for dissertation chapters?

Generating structured revision plans involves reviewing the chapter draft, dissertation framework, and progress history to produce prioritized issues, strengths, and acceptance-criteria checks for committee-style assessment.

Do I need a complete chapter plan and literature files to use dissertation-critic?

Dissertation-critic requires reading the target chapter, chapter plan, dissertation framework, literature files, and progress history to produce structured feedback. A complete draft and supporting documents are necessary for rigorous evaluation.

Why does my dissertation chapter review show methodological problems and literature gaps?

Methodological problems and literature gaps surface during chapter review when the core claim lacks defensible support, source quality is inadequate, or engagement with relevant scholarly conversations is missing from the draft.