dlp-gap-analysis

Identify DLP coverage gaps across AI-era exfiltration channels.

Updated May 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/blamejs/exceptd-skills --skill dlp-gap-analysis
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dlp-gap-analysis
Source: https://github.com/blamejs/exceptd-skills/tree/main/skills/dlp-gap-analysis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/blamejs/exceptd-skills --skill dlp-gap-analysis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Legacy data loss prevention (DLP) tools are built for network-centric, on-prem environments and completely miss AI-era exfiltration channels including LLM prompts, MCP tool-call arguments, RAG retrievals, embedding-store queries, and code-completion telemetry. This Skill eliminates the risk of false compliance confidence by identifying these gaps and mapping them to real-world threat patterns and cross-jurisdictional privacy requirements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Framework Gap Mapping: Flags insufficient controls across 10+ global compliance regimes including NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, and 35 other AI/security frameworks.
  • AI-Channel DLP Audit: Enumerates and assesses coverage for modern exfiltration channels including LLM prompt egress, MCP tool argument inspection, RAG corpus retrieval, embedding-store membership inference, and IDE telemetry leaks.
  • Prioritized Remediation Guidance: Uses the RWEP scoring model aligned with MITRE ATLAS v2026.06 and ATT&CK v19.1 TTPs to prioritize gaps based on real-world exploitation risk, AI-acceleration potential, and regulatory exposure.
  • Use Case: A healthcare compliance team can use this Skill to identify that their existing boundary DLP controls cannot inspect LLM prompt content containing PHI under TLS, and implement SDK-level prompt logging and MCP gateway inspection as auditable compensating controls.

Quick Start

Use the dlp-gap-analysis skill to run a full audit of your organization's DLP coverage for AI-era exfiltration channels and generate a prioritized gap report mapped to your applicable compliance frameworks.

Frequently Asked Questions about dlp-gap-analysis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit DLP controls for AI-era exfiltration channels like LLM prompts and RAG retrievals?

To audit DLP controls for AI exfiltration channels, enumerate LLM prompt egress, MCP tool arguments, RAG retrievals, and embedding-store queries to identify coverage gaps that legacy network-centric tools fail to monitor. This maps blind spots to global compliance regimes and MITRE ATLAS TTPs.

What data loss prevention gaps exist when using LLMs and MCP tooling under GDPR or HIPAA?

Data loss prevention gaps under GDPR or HIPAA include failing to inspect LLM prompt content containing PHI under TLS and lacking MCP gateway inspection. These AI-channel blind spots are mapped against NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and 35 other frameworks to ensure compliance.

How do I map AI security gaps to MITRE ATLAS adversarial TTPs for prioritized remediation?

Map AI security gaps to MITRE ATLAS TTPs by applying the RWEP scoring model aligned with ATT&CK v19.1. This prioritizes remediation based on real-world exploitation risk, AI-acceleration potential, and regulatory exposure across modern exfiltration channels.

Does legacy DLP work for AI-powered development environments and code-completion telemetry?

Legacy DLP does not work effectively for AI-powered development environments because it misses code-completion telemetry leaks and IDE telemetry. A targeted gap analysis is required to identify these uninspected channels and implement SDK-level prompt logging as compensating controls.

Can I use a gap analysis to generate compliance audit reports for RAG systems and embedding stores?

You can use a gap analysis to generate compliance audit reports for RAG systems by assessing embedding-store membership inference and corpus retrieval coverage. It flags insufficient controls and produces a prioritized report mapped to applicable global privacy regulations.

What is the RWEP scoring model for prioritizing AI data exfiltration risk?

The RWEP scoring model prioritizes AI data exfiltration risk by evaluating real-world exploitation potential, AI-acceleration factors, and regulatory exposure. It aligns with MITRE ATLAS v2026.06 and ATT&CK v19.1 TTPs to guide compensating control implementation.