What problem does it solve?
Delegating coding or documentation tasks to AI agents often produces unverified output with hidden defects, forcing developers to manually review every change. This Skill orchestrates an implementation sub-agent, a meta-judge that builds evaluation criteria, and an independent judge that scores the result, iterating with feedback until quality thresholds are met.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Parallel Meta-Judge and Implementation Dispatch: Generates tailored evaluation rubrics while the implementation agent works, then verifies output against those criteria.
- Automatic Retry with Feedback: Retries up to 3 times with specific judge-identified issues, escalating model tiers (haiku → sonnet → opus) when quality gaps indicate capability limits.
- Model Selection Policy: Selects cost-appropriate model tiers based on task scope, complexity, and risk, with cross-provider tier mapping for non-Anthropic models.
- Use Case: Run a refactoring task like "Refactor the UserService class to use dependency injection" and receive verified, judge-scored output without reading or writing any code yourself.
Quick Start
Ask the agent to run /do-and-judge followed by your task description, optionally adding --strict to require a score of 4.0 or higher before passing.