doc-coauthoring

Guide structured co-authored documentation through context gathering, section drafting, and reader testing.

Updated May 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/234194027-cpu/xianclaw --skill doc-coauthoring-234194027-cpu
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: doc-coauthoring
Source: https://github.com/234194027-cpu/xianclaw/tree/main/resources/openclaw/config/skills/doc-coauthoring
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/234194027-cpu/xianclaw --skill doc-coauthoring-234194027-cpu

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The doc-coauthoring skill helps you turn incomplete or unstructured ideas into a documentation draft that works for readers who did not follow your internal context.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Context Gathering with Clarifying Questions: Collects the right audience, impact, format, constraints, and domain context before drafting.
  • Iterative Refinement by Sections: Builds the document section-by-section using brainstorming, curation, drafting, and surgical edits to converge on the right structure.
  • Reader Testing for Blind Spots: Validates the final result by testing with a fresh reader persona to catch ambiguity, missing assumptions, and inconsistencies.

Quick Start

Ask doc-coauthoring to guide you through co-authoring a structured decision doc by first gathering context, then drafting it section-by-section, and finally running reader testing to verify it is understandable without prior discussion.

Frequently Asked Questions about doc-coauthoring

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn messy notes into a structured technical proposal?

To turn messy notes into a structured technical proposal, the skill collects missing context, drafts sections iteratively, and validates clarity with reader testing to ensure coherence for audiences lacking prior discussion.

What is the best way to draft a decision doc that readers understand without context?

The best way to draft a decision doc for uninitiated readers is to perform reader-focused ambiguity and assumption checks. This workflow tests the final draft against a fresh reader persona to catch blind spots and validate usability.

How do I write a PRF or design doc section by section?

To write a PRD or design doc section by section, use an iterative refinement process that generates and curates structured section options, drafts content, and applies surgical edits to converge on the correct structure and coherence.

Can I use this workflow for technical writing tasks like RFCs and proposals?

Yes, you can use this workflow for technical writing tasks like RFCs and proposals. It specifically applies to documentation where correctness, coherence, and reader usability matter, gathering constraints and domain context before drafting.

Why does my documentation draft still contain ambiguous assumptions?

Your documentation draft likely contains ambiguous assumptions because it lacked reader-focused validation. By testing with a fresh reader persona, you can catch missing assumptions, resolve inconsistencies, and verify the document works for readers who did not follow internal context.