doc-maintenance

Documentation drift is detected by comparing recent git commits against current project docs. This identifies outdated information in your README or SPEC files and proposes minimal factual corrections to ensure consistency with the latest features and architecture.

The best way to audit project documentation is to compare your docs content against recent project changes. This approach finds outdated or inaccurate information and suggests minimal, targeted edits to correct inconsistencies without requiring extensive rewrites.

Yes, you can automatically generate factual corrections for your README and SPEC files. The system proposes minimal, targeted edits aligned with the latest project state to correct inconsistencies without forcing you to perform extensive manual rewrites.

You need an accessible git repository with recent commits available for comparison. The audit relies on comparing these git changes against your current documentation materials to verify accuracy and enforce strict change detection for your project scope.

Project documentation shows inconsistencies after a major release because of documentation drift, where recent code changes outpace manual updates. Comparing your recent git commits with current docs helps identify and propose minimal corrections for these factual gaps.