Coordinate six independent agents to review documents for gaps, conflicts, and risks.
npx skills add https://github.com/ukwhatn/.claude --skill doc-review-ukwhatn
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: doc-review Source: https://github.com/ukwhatn/.claude/tree/main/skills/doc-review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ukwhatn/.claude --skill doc-review-ukwhatn
Coordinating multiple expert reviews of a document can be slow and inconsistent. This skill orchestrates six independent agents to review a document from diverse angles, ensuring comprehensive coverage and faster feedback.
Submit the target document path to initiate a six-agent parallel review (e.g., /path/to/design-spec.md).
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To run a multi-agent review on a design spec, submit the target document path to initiate parallel processing. The system orchestrates six independent agents to review the document simultaneously from architecture, security, consistency, usability, and business alignment perspectives.
Parallel multi-agent document review is a process where six independent agents evaluate a document simultaneously from diverse angles. This mechanism ensures comprehensive coverage of architecture, security, consistency, usability, and business alignment to surface gaps, conflicts, and risks before implementation.
Yes, you can use parallel review to find contradictions in requirements. The six independent agents cross-verify design docs, specifications, and plans for completeness and feasibility, specifically surfacing contradictions, gaps, and risks before implementation begins.
Yes, multi-agent review outputs structured findings for quality assurance by producing consolidated reports with clear severity labels. The output includes AR/R/M findings and a centralized action list to provide actionable fixes for the identified document gaps.
A limitation of automated document review is its contextual scope; the six independent agents are specifically designed to apply checks to design specs, requirements, and plans. It focuses on surfacing gaps and risks rather than generating new documentation or writing code.
costrict-plugins-repoGenerate structured implementation plans from specifications with tasks, files, and milestones.
paultyngEvaluate implementation plans and issue READY, NEEDS_REVISION, or BLOCKED verdicts with prioritized findings.
velesarMap Conway's Law alignment between code architecture and team structure.
ZeptinyAnalyze document content for quality, coherence, security, and scope.
