docs-review

To check codebase documentation accuracy, review project docs against the actual code to verify completeness, consistency, and freshness. This manual process complements automated checks by identifying missing features and outdated behaviors, ensuring documentation aligns with recent code changes.

The best way to find missing features is performing a completeness review against the codebase. This involves manually checking that all documented options, behaviors, and features accurately reflect the current code, ensuring no undocumented or missing elements exist in the project documentation.

To ensure documentation consistency across different software project files, manually review all docs to confirm they do not contradict each other. This consistency check verifies that various documentation sections align with the codebase and present a unified, accurate description of features.

Yes, manual documentation review is designed to complement automated codebase alignment checks. While automated tools handle structural formatting, manual reviews focus on verifying accuracy, clarity, and completeness, ensuring the documentation is understandable and accurately reflects code behaviors.

You should review project documentation for codebase alignment whenever there are recent code changes or new features. This freshness check ensures the documentation accurately reflects the updated codebase, reducing discrepancies and improving the developer experience and user satisfaction.