dogfood

Explore web applications and generate bug reports with screenshots and videos.

Updated Jul 18, 2026

Search Tags:#testing #qa #web-automation #bug-hunting #agent-browser #repro-evidence

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/arthrod/conejo-skills --skill dogfood-arthrod

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dogfood
Source: https://github.com/arthrod/conejo-skills/tree/main/skills/dogfood
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/arthrod/conejo-skills --skill dogfood-arthrod

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the problem of inconsistent, poorly documented, or non-reproducible bug reporting during web application testing.

Core Features & Use Cases

Systematic Exploration: Automates the navigation and interaction flow of a web application to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Evidence-First Reporting: Generates structured reports containing annotated screenshots, reproduction videos, and step-by-step instructions for every identified issue.
Use Case: Use this when you need to perform a full QA pass on a staging environment, ensuring that every bug found is accompanied by a video and screenshot proof that developers can use to fix the issue immediately.

Quick Start

Use the dogfood skill to perform an exploratory test on the website at https://example.com and generate a full bug report.

Frequently Asked Questions about dogfood

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform exploratory testing on a web application with reproducible bug evidence?▼

To generate bug reproduction videos during web QA, you need a tool that executes browser-based interactions and records the session. This systematic exploration captures high-fidelity reproduction evidence, providing developers with visual proof of functional and visual issues.

What is the best way to document non-reproducible bugs found during a staging environment QA pass?▼

The best way to document non-reproducible bugs is to use evidence-first reporting that generates structured reports containing annotated screenshots, reproduction videos, and step-by-step instructions. This ensures every functional, visual, or UX issue found during QA is accompanied by high-fidelity proof.

Do I need an agent-browser tool to automate web application bug hunting sessions?▼

Yes, you need an agent-browser tool to execute browser-based interactions, capture screenshots, and record reproduction videos during bug hunting sessions. It enables the systematic navigation and interaction flow required to identify functional, visual, and UX issues comprehensively.

Can I use automated web testing to capture visual and UX issues alongside functional bugs?▼

Yes, automated web testing can systematically explore web applications to identify functional, visual, and UX issues simultaneously. By capturing screenshots and recording reproduction videos, it provides comprehensive coverage and high-fidelity evidence for all identified problems.

How does systematic exploration improve web app test coverage compared to manual QA?▼

Systematic exploration automates navigation and interaction flows to ensure comprehensive test coverage across web applications. Unlike manual QA, it consistently applies testing logic across the entire UI, capturing structured reproduction evidence for every functional, visual, and UX issue encountered.