dogfood

Automate browser-based QA testing and generate evidence-rich bug reports.

6|2|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GregsGreyCode/Logos --skill dogfood-gregsgreycode
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dogfood
Source: https://github.com/GregsGreyCode/Logos/tree/main/skills/dogfood
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GregsGreyCode/Logos --skill dogfood-gregsgreycode

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematic QA testing of web applications to uncover defects, collect evidence, and generate structured bug reports.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guided, browser-driven exploration to identify issues across web apps.
  • Captures screenshots, console logs, and interactive state for reproducible reports.
  • Generates a formatted QA report template suitable for stakeholder review.

Quick Start

Start by providing a target URL and testing scope, then run the dogfood skill to begin structured exploratory QA on that site.

Frequently Asked Questions about dogfood

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate end-to-end browser QA testing for a web application?

Automated end-to-end browser QA testing is performed by providing a target URL and testing scope to initiate guided exploration that identifies defects across web apps. The process requires a browser toolset and an output directory to store artifacts like console logs.

What is structured exploratory QA and how does it capture bug evidence?

Structured exploratory QA systematically uncovers defects by capturing screenshots, console logs, and interactive state during browser-driven exploration. This evidence capture generates reproducible, formatted bug reports suitable for stakeholder review.

Do I need specific input data or directories to generate QA reports for web apps?

Generating QA reports requires a target URL, a defined testing scope, and an output directory to store artifacts. The browser toolset uses these inputs to drive exploration and save captured evidence like screenshots and logs.

What's the best way to document browser console logs and screenshots for bug reports?

The best way to document browser console logs and screenshots for bug reports is to use automated evidence capture during systematic exploration. This generates a formatted QA report template that consolidates interactive state and defects for stakeholder review.

Can I use automated browser testing to identify defects without writing test scripts?

Automated browser testing can identify defects without explicit scripts by using guided, browser-driven exploration. You provide a target URL and testing scope, and the systematic process captures interactive state and console logs to uncover issues.

When should I not use guided exploratory QA for web application testing?

Guided exploratory QA for web application testing is not suitable when you lack a defined target URL, testing scope, or an output directory for artifacts. It requires a browser toolset to capture interactive state, screenshots, and console logs.