dogfood

Explore web applications to identify bugs and UX issues with reproduction reports.

3|2|Updated Jan 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tysonthomas9/loomcli --skill dogfood-tysonthomas9
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dogfood
Source: https://github.com/tysonthomas9/loomcli/tree/main/internal/webui/frontend/.agents/skills/dogfood
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tysonthomas9/loomcli --skill dogfood-tysonthomas9

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Systematically explore a web application to identify bugs, UX issues, and quality gaps across features and user flows.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured exploration workflows for feature, UI, and edge-case testing
  • Automatic generation of a reproduction-ready report with screenshots and videos
  • Reproducible issue capture and template-driven output for handoff to engineering teams

Quick Start

Initialize a dogfood session and begin an automated exploratory analysis of the web app.

Frequently Asked Questions about dogfood

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform exploratory testing on a web application to find UX issues and bugs?

Exploratory testing of a web application involves systematically navigating features and user flows to identify bugs and UX gaps. Structured workflows apply during QA cycles to assess quality across UI and edge cases.

How do I generate a bug reproduction report with step-by-step evidence for engineering handoff?

A bug reproduction report captures issues using a template-driven output format. It includes step-by-step reproduction evidence with screenshots and videos, ensuring engineering teams can reliably recreate and resolve software defects.

What is dogfooding in web application QA and when should I use it?

Dogfooding in web app QA is the process of thoroughly assessing your own application across features and flows to find quality gaps. Use it during QA cycles or when a thorough exploratory assessment is needed.

Can I systematically test web app edge cases and feature flows without writing automated test scripts?

Yes, you can systematically test web app edge cases through structured exploratory workflows. This method assesses features, UI, and edge cases across user flows without requiring automated scripts, outputting findings into a structured report.

What is the best way to document quality gaps and UI issues found during manual web app testing?

The best way to document quality gaps and UI issues is using a structured dogfood report template. It preserves findings with reproduction-ready evidence like screenshots and videos, facilitating clear handoff to engineering teams.